Comments on: Constitution of India and Rights of Equality & Backward Classes

By: Dr. O. P. Sudrania

Dr. O. P. Sudrania — Mon, 01 Apr 2013 06:00:38 +0000

Respected Paul Ponniahji,
I copypaste your part of comment: “I too am a suffer and I have observed the suffering of the poor, who need comfort and education for better management of their affairs.”

Your intentions are apparently pious and your quote for price of milk and your lament for personal ‘suffer’ and sympathy for ‘poor….’ is understandable because these are the perceptible instruments for predatory proselytisation of the gullible so called “poor, untouchables, etc…”. Instead of lamenting and shedding false crocodile tears and one should engage in genuine and true “Seva” work devoid of any hidden gains for foot soldiers. Only then will it be accepted by Lord Jesus as a service to man is the service to God. Thanks for your poor sympathy and I sympathise for your ‘suffer’ too. Pray Jesus for liberation of your ‘suffer’…

By: Paul Ponniah

Paul Ponniah — Sun, 31 Mar 2013 15:30:47 +0000

Thank you for the correction and providing the info about the status of India Constitution and it application for the development of the society to develop under the provisions. I too am a suffer and I have observed the suffering of the poor, who need comfort and education for better management of their affairs.
For example consider the cost of milk that the rural people get, was increased by Re.1/ and the people where happy. Then the feed cost also increased, therefore the benefit given was lost. The marketing of milk to the consumer has also increased to Rs.28/ per litre. Note benefits not the farmer, who sweats in the sun nor the consumer. What do you think? Is this fair, there are many things so, so. Hope changes will soon be for the better poor Indians. The rich become richer, while the poor?

By: Dr. O. P. Sudrania

Dr. O. P. Sudrania — Sun, 31 Mar 2013 14:01:13 +0000

@ Paul Ponniah
“Their (sic) is no honesty in it, for the true nature of every Indian is defused beyond reform.” Please specify where this honesty is on sale? No society is exception to this ubiquitous human character. I could recollect Lord Macauley, who quoting Lord Baron, had said, “Three fourths of world’s problems are due to the greed (I add dishonesty and impetuouness) of one fourth of the people…” In fact, looking back, his figure of ‘one fourth people’ may be actually exaggeration, they are far less than that.

In fact, if we could reform Americans, who pretend to be a global policeman, most of global problems can be made easier, if not fully eliminated. Is America practicing fully its “First Amendment” in her constitution? Why is there only a discussion of “Church and State” only? America must be the most ill informed state, where its Lawmaker on the corridors of ‘White House’ could ask, “Are you a Hindu sunni or Hindu Shia”? Yet India must be blamed for all its (inflicted) wounds…

I don’t know, “Which country or religion, you may belong to, which colours or makes us colour blind, the essence of your ‘I state’ could have been better judged. Irrespectively, I have taken a lot of time, energy and resources to ‘state’ my eleven chapter series, only if you would care to read carefully, in stead of making a casual self incriminating ‘I state’…. Thank you for visiting this site and your whatever interest…

By: Paul Ponniah

Paul Ponniah — Sat, 30 Mar 2013 11:20:11 +0000

I state the division in society cannot be eliminated for the social and educational and economic diversity of the people of India cannot be united, unless everyone has the basic right as spelled out in the constitution is applied with bias. For which political parties should not use then as spring boards to form a government. Their is no honesty in it, for the true nature of every Indian is defused beyond reform.

By: Dr. O. P. Sudrania

Dr. O. P. Sudrania — Sun, 17 Jun 2012 20:03:18 +0000

Madhu, you are right and I point out two more facts. One that the architect of Indian Constitution himself is said to belong to the untouchable caste. Secondly it is said that our Democracy is based on the British Mestminster module style. But the British system of Democracy is not a true democracy either. They have the Monarchy as their head of the state. Hence it is a flawed democracy ab initio. It can happen in a state like India only where everything is imposed by the “High Command”. This same culture perpetuates in the political arena of the party whip. It does not occur elsewhere.

By: Madhu Gohil

Madhu Gohil — Wed, 13 Jun 2012 12:54:55 +0000

In a country where it has a constitution that STATES in very plain words –
____________________________

14. Equality before law.—The State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the equal protection of the laws within theterritory ofIndia.

15. Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex or place of birth.—(1) The State shall not discriminate against any citizen on grounds only of religion, race, caste, sex, place of birth or any of them.

(2) No citizen shall, on grounds only of religion, race, caste, sex, place of birth or any of them, be subject to any disability, liability, restriction or condition with regard to—

(a) access to shops, public restaurants, hotels and places of public entertainment; or

(b) the use of wells, tanks, bathing ghats, roads and places of public resort maintained wholly or partly out of State funds or dedicated to the use of the general public.

(3) Nothing in this article shall prevent the State from making any special provision for women and children.

(4) Nothing in this article or in clause (2) of article 29 shall prevent the State from making any special provision for the advancement of any socially and educationally backward classes of citizens or for the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes.
__________________________

the country shows that it contradicts itself in matters of EAQUALITY…… THE FIRST LINE SAYS THERE WILL BE NO DISCRIMINATION ON ANY BASIS AND THEN GOES ON TO SAY IT CAN MAKE SPECIAL PROVISIONS FOR A CERTAIN GROUP OF PEOPLE….

THAT IS DISCRIMINATION AND NOTHING ELSE AND THEREFORE INDIA IS NOT A DEMOCRACY…… EVERY MAN SHOULD BE TREATED AS EQUAL….